Will Defense Distributed's shots be heard 'round the world?

The defense weapon created in a 3D printer Distributed looks unprofessional, but new technologies can make a big explosion humility

New

that pranksters Texas in navigation under the banner of "defense distributed" have managed to create a firearm work using 3D printing technology has thrown the cat in the . attic reaction was hyperactive traditional American Democratic legislators Representative Steve Israel of New York was the first starting positions:. he sponsored a bill that would prohibit "undetectable" weapons, announced today, added weapons 3D printed regulations. "security checks, background checks and regulations weapons will no good," said the

New York Daily News

"if criminals can print their own guns plastic at home and bring guns through metal detectors without anyone knowing."

Meanwhile, printers weapons lost no opportunity to hype their achievement. "I see a world where technology has said that you can more or less be able to have what you want," said Cody Wilson, the Chief of the Defence distributed. "It depends on the political actors." It is an elegant way of speaking that leads to publishers that they lie in their bunkers, wondering about the technology out of control and he is the head, while in another part of the technology evangelists forest feared boffins Defense distributed 3D printing has a very bad reputation.

that are in effect. But in fact, everyone was giving 3D printing any type of name. It is seen variously as a revolutionary technology that will transform the production and jobs to the United States, a serious threat to the intellectual property, democratization technology that allow individuals and small businesses, a powerful force for good medicine, a new form of haute couture. and as exaggerated so exaggerated

What happens is that people project their hopes, fears and fantasies about what is essentially a logical extension of an old technology - jet printer ink. Instead of ink jet through small nozzles controlled by the computer, however, a 3D printer jet plastic beads or other materials, and creates three-dimensional objects by "printing" layers off successive data as in a computerized object model.

• Although there are very sophisticated applications of 3D printing in the industry (in the manufacture of aircraft, for example), most things produced by 3D printing in the public domain seems very bad as the layman. The weapon of Texas, for example, seems naive and simplistic compared to, say, a Walther PPK. One can only imagine incredulous smile Q James Bond if it is offered.
• But for those who have followed the work of Harvard scholar Clayton Christensen in recent years, even crudity of the printed object is what it seems, because it raises the possibility of a disruptive change. Christensen is famous for his pioneering studies of industrial innovation. He wanted to understand is why the big companies that succeed are often destroyed or humiliated by the new technologies that do not appreciate the significance.

The reason why successful companies are surprised, Christensen found is that the first manifestations of technology are managed so thought seems to represent a threat to incumbents. Your products, though expensive, are also polished and refined, it seems incredible that their customers would be tempted by these pathetic devices.

It turns out that some customers are willing to buy the crappy product, they can not afford the expensive stuff, and manufacturers of dangerous products quickly improve, make it less terrible. And the cream on the lower segment of the market incumbents. And so on until the holders (or companies for that to happen to entire industries) passes underneath.

Find best price for : --Kodak----Christensen----Clayton----Harvard----Texas--