may be normal for a doctor compensation for pain and suffering far more than most of the victims of physical or psychological harm can expect to receive?Did you register
this case, the other day that the employment tribunal in Leeds received £ 4.5m consultant for the hospital of the anguish he suffered during a campaign long and horrible by his colleagues at the Hospital Pontefract General to strengthen its place?
As indicated, the treatment of Dr. Eva Michalak was ugly test the ability of humanity to be mean and cruel, and noble and altruistic. It never ceases to amaze me. But even some of the prices coming out of the labor courts.
kidney specialist from Poland has suffered years of harassment and be deemed to have succumbed to PTSD and suicidal thoughts in response. However, 4.5 million pounds? The money from the budget of a hospital in trouble in a region that passes through its own economic and social development post-traumatic stress at Christmas?
I do not want to disrespect Michalak and his family when I say that I think a lot of money. Many people suffer from this type of treatment at work - I know some, when they do - and either do not go to court, to survive and work in silence or quit and start over elsewhere
In this case the price is said to have been made for unfair dismissal and racial and sexual discrimination. Ah, yes. Michalak, 53, is Polish by birth and obviously a woman. He was on maternity leave shortly after his appointment in Pontefract nine years ago, which triggered the long dispute with colleagues.
is not the first time, I think in a country where money is scarce, the allegations of discrimination based on race or sex are often more reliable financial compensation a week work 40 hours, winning the lottery or Britain Got Talent.
not just something that got up in the tabloids, where some multiple complainants series (the claims process is not as traumatic as it should be for others) find that seekers employment with In order to claim. Surprisingly, even winning the event. Forward electronic reports.
That is my not so subtle to make a rare foray into the sports pages, which dominated the last 48 hours in eight-game ban Luis Suarez racial abuse Liverpool Manchester United Patrice Evra and charges against John Terry of Chelsea, for an alleged racial slur against the Anton Ferdinand QPR.
course, after the decision of the case Crown Prosecution Terry is sub judice and it is possible to say that, in addition to being kept in mind that both the support of his jobs Club captain and England, at least for now.
Feelings are high on both sides. Who is right? The court will decide next year. In the absence of overwhelming evidence, it is likely that feelings remain high.
but Suarez / Evra is not disputed in court. The prohibition and much less well-£ 40,000 was imposed by an independent commission, chaired by Paul Goulding QC and appointed by the Football Association.
is the kind of competitive conditions of the money goes to public institutions, once convinced now reduced due to many challenges arbitrator's decision in both walks of life. The referee is fallible (and often show replays), but this is not always the problem.
All right-thinking people seem to think that Suarez was a blow to the rights and the Liverpool erred in issuing a statement of support for the defense of his Uruguayan star.
The Guardian, Richard Williams, an old and wise, thinks so, and has a lot to me, whose knowledge of the complexity and the label of the beautiful game could be confined to a postage stamp sized microchip but the information lite.
However, the consensus is always a challenge. From what I read, I would not want one of the players in the dispute to marry my sister - or yours. Both have spots on your professional resume Stanley Matthews that the saint had not bothered to read.Liverpool Kenny Dalglish
complains that her man did not receive a fair trial and that Evra is a way of exaggerated claims.
seems to also be approved by both parties (no witnesses among the players on each side) that Evra, Senegal-born French international, Suarez said in Spanish rude, insulting "the most unacceptable conditions" , the declaration of Anfield.
What is it? I'm not a football web sites, so it may be the only person in Britain who do not know what to say Evra admits, even a cursory glance will not reveal. Maybe it was something Suarez's wife or girlfriend, the kind of thing is quite common in cricket - sleigh, as the saying goes, very funny at times. Try this sample.
In basketball verbal abuse designed to disrupt an opponent who is called "trash talk" in ice hockey, "sing".
Find best price for : --Thatcher----King----Luther----Martin----Hansen----Evra----Suárez----Michalak--