วันอาทิตย์ที่ 20 พฤศจิกายน พ.ศ. 2554

The joy of statistics

Lily Asquith

on the subject and bosons and fermions Satyendra Bose-Einstein letter.

a couple of weeks, Jon and I wrote the same blog, at the same time (well, at the same time by Jon in London as it was for me in Chicago). It would not be surprising that the Higgs boson been discovered and written about the Higgs discovery. But he had, and they were not. This may be the problem. We will LHC give us some things to say.

is true that this is not a major disaster. A friend of mine just spent a year of his life calculating a correction loop QCD amplitudes soft for someone just after the same job before him. He stood facing it by throwing an orgy of concerts with dark bands in the North and four types of salsa and hours of physics is about to leave for a job at the patent office.

I tried to eliminate repetition, and in doing so have probably made this blog a little lumpy, but at least it is functional as a beneficiary of art Toya.

Satyendra Bose

was the first person, I think, to realize that there is a fundamental difference between the particles we know today as fermions and bosons.

He came to this realization by accident, apparently. He gave a talk and he made a stupid mistake. The conference was intended to show how the observed behavior does not fit the theory, but because I made a small mistake at the conference, which ended up showing the theory well. I have been to many conferences that might be in this class, if it had not ended in a cloud of chalk dust and muttering. From what I understand, the conference did not end that way Bose. He realized his mistake immediately, because he was very intelligent and has a simple mistake.

The best example I can find to explain just what happened is in the wikipedia, I have confidence in other cases, that any discussion of what reality is. In fact, Wikipedia is mistaken in his description of bosons, but now I'm sad.

launch two parts. What are the possible outcomes? Two heads, two tails or one head and a tail or a tail and a head. Three results is that different or is it four? Bose in error was three. It would show how things work when the head + tail, was not the same as the tail + head. He was wrong, or maybe not, maybe it was your brain thinking about the future of the conference.

For photons and bosons other hand, the head + tail is exactly the same as the queues + head.

Method Bose possible to give a description of how photons behave very well adapt to what was observed. Nobody understood what he was saying what he wrote to Albert Einstein, and voila, Einstein made that all or to undertake or pretend to understand.



Find best price for : --Pauli----Higgs--

ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:

แสดงความคิดเห็น